<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talk about U.S. Immigration &#187; visa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://haranlaw.com/blog/index.php/category/visa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://haranlaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>The present H-1B situation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>U.S. Embassy in China allowing Forum Shopping</title>
		<link>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/07/21/china-forumshopping-allowed/</link>
		<comments>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/07/21/china-forumshopping-allowed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lalita Haran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://haranlaw.com/blog/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Visa applications could be made any where in China.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visa applications by Chinese residents could now be made at any of the Consular sections in China irrespective of the place of residence of the applicant.  The Consular sections at Chengdu, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Shenyang or at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing could now entertain such applications from anywhere in China.  This welcome change could help Chinese residents avoid the strict standards imposed at some centers.  </p>
<p>Generally, foreign nationals are required to apply for a non immigrant visa at a specific consular post abroad having jurisdiction over the foreign national&#8217;s place of residence.  This is done to prevent forum shopping at a Consular post i.e. prefer a post that is likely to grant favorable result.  </p>
<p>Consequently, forum shopping is now allowed in China.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/07/21/china-forumshopping-allowed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U Visa Certification</title>
		<link>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/03/30/u-visa/</link>
		<comments>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/03/30/u-visa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lalita Haran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worksite investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims of abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims of crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://haranlaw.com/blog/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U visa potential may be discovered by the government at worksite investigation.  New possibilities for U Visa Certification.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a welcome development for U Visa, the Department of Labor announced that it would start certifying the U visa applications.  The Secretary of Labor issued a statement on March 16, 2010 that if a workplace investigation reveals foreign nationals as victims of crime or abuse, investigators would be able to identify  them as potential U visa applicants.  Such identification of foreign national would be based upon their willingness to assist in the investigation or prosecution of crime. </p>
<p>The U non immigrant visa is available to victims of qualified criminal activities, who have suffered substantial physical or mental abuse and who assist or agree to assist law enforcement or other designated officials in investigation or prosecution of those crimes.  </p>
<p>Qualifying criminal activities involve violations of certain federal, state or local criminal laws, including: abduction, abusive sexual contact, blackmail, domestic violence, extortion, false imprisonment, female genital mutilation, felonious assault, hostage-taking, incest, involuntary servitude, kidnapping, manslaughter, murder, obstruction of justice, peonage, perjury, prostitution, rape, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, slave trade, torture, trafficking, witness tampering, unlawful criminal restraint and other related crimes.</p>
<p>Eligibility for U Visa is based upon certification by designated authorities of the assistance provided by the foreign national in the investigation or prosecution.  Applicants can obtain lawful temporary resident status and employment authorization while their application is pending adjudication.</p>
<p>The DOL statement is an effort in the right direction.  Hopefully it would act as a deterrant against those perpetuatinf abuse.  It surely would help crime detection and enforcement of penalties where the foreign nationals possess the necessary evidence but would not disclose the evidence or silently endure the abuse for fear of deportation.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/03/30/u-visa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>H-1B Employer</title>
		<link>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/03/16/h-1b-employer/</link>
		<comments>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/03/16/h-1b-employer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lalita Haran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[H-1b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer employee relationship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://haranlaw.com/blog/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H1B petitions require proof of employer employee relationship for approval.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Specialty Occupation foreign national worker i.e. H-1b visa holders to whom we credit boosting the American economy would soon become a rarity.  Soon after the H-1b quota was lowered, the government targetted the IT (information technology) industry with special focus on computer consultancy businesses alleging visa abuse.  H1 petitions for these jobs are closely reviewed so also the foreign Nationals hired who reenter with H1b visa for IT consultancy jobs face stringent scrutiny.  Reports of RFEs, petition denials for lack of desired documentation and visa refusal at the port of entry to let the unwary foreign national into the country are becoming frequent.</p>
<p>A Memo issued by the USCIS beginning this year has been the underlying cause.  The agency Memo requires that h1b petitions show presence of employer and employee relationship and details several factors indicating such relationship.  In addition to the traditionally accepted standards such as abilities to pay, hire and fire, it includes exercise of control and suprvision by the employer over the job performed as the necessary indicia of employer and employee relationship.  </p>
<p>Factors indicating presence of employer and employee relationships are well established in the subsatntive law and same policies have been followed by USCIS in adjudicating visa petitions.  The government memo attempts to borrow these same concepts is a compilation of its poilicies followed so far.  However, there has been wide opposition to the memo which is called as untra vires because its issuance did not follow the requisite government procedure detailed in the Administrative Procedure Act.  However, even if unltravires, until withdrawn we are required to follow the Memo and its mandate and prove as required, the presence of employer-employee relationship for a successful H1b petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/03/16/h-1b-employer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa to India: new restrictions</title>
		<link>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/visa_restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/visa_restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lalita Haran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Changes in Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourist visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://haranlaw.com/blog/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visa regulations in India are changing as government imposes stricter restrictions on foreign travellers.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visa regulations in India are changing as government imposes stricter restrictions on foreign travellers.   It may be that the Government policy for visa issuance is also changing.  Practices acceptable hitherto are prohibited.  There are reports of foreign Consulates posting complaints on their websites about this practice.  The cause may either be increase in international traffic to the country or perhaps the hightened terror threats but most likely both.  </p>
<p>Increase in tourism and also in the business and employment opportunities in the country has lead to increase in foreign nationals travelling to India.  The government of India declared that foreign nationals enter with visas that is consistent with the purpose of their stay.  In its November 25th press release, the government said that the business visa should be used strictly for business visits i.e. relating to purchase or sale of products or for setting up a business or industrial establishment.  </p>
<p>Employment visa should be sought if the purpose is to execute a project.  This visa is granted to senior level skilled and qualified professionals.  Restrictions apply when large number of qualified local workers are available.  It reminds me of the United States&#8217; Labor Certification process requirement where an employer must tap the local labor market before offering a foreign national permanent employment.  These measures are nationalistic in nature and are designed to protect loal job market.  The measures would be increasingly adopted by countries of the world because as labor becomes mobile and supply of labor/services comes internationally i.e.  qualified foreign workers move accross national borders to take up employment there would be greater desire to protect local job market.   </p>
<p>The Indian government had earlier directed the foreign nationals with inappripriate visa to exit by October 31, 2009, (extendable in certain circumstances) and return with appropriate visa.  The government claimed that foreign nationals accept gainful employment but remain within the country on visitors visa.  There ought to be a procedure to apply for change of status from within the coutry.  It is yet to be seen how the employment restrictions are applied.  In my opinion until talented foreign workers are willing to accept Indian wage levels which are relatively low when compared internationally, the restrictions would stay relaxed.</p>
<p>Visitor visa travellors face two month restriction on return.  It is reported that the the foreign nationals used to travel to a contiguous country and return within a few days with a valid visitors visa.  Perhaps, the government became aware of this issue only lately.  So, now, the new restriction makes a quick return to India on visitors visa impossible.  Foreign nationals report that their passports are stamped with the return restriction before they exit.  There are numerous reports that the foreign Consulates are expressing their concern over the changes although I doubt that the resentment is over the changes per se.  It would be more about the lack of publicity of these changes or about their inconsistent implementation.  Also, it is unclear what is the extent of these restrictions as I try to explore the legal authority behind it.  </p>
<p>The Chicago Indian Consulate confirmed the tourist visa return restrictions but said that certain exceptions apply including visit for emergent circumstances.  Family or business exigencies like a death of a family member or a business need would fall in this category.  My enquiry to the Consulate also confirmed that the restrictions do not apply to Card holders who possess Overseas Citizenship to India (OCI) and Persons of Indian Origin (PIO).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://haranlaw.com/blog/2010/01/20/visa_restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.546 seconds -->
